<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2008 MLB Preview: Boston Red Sox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reclinergm.com/2008-preview-boston-red-sox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/2008-preview-boston-red-sox/</link>
	<description>Philly sports blog for diehard Sixers &#38; Phillies fans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 08:35:28 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 2008 MLB Preview &#171; The ReclinerGM Sports Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/2008-preview-boston-red-sox/#comment-433</link>
		<dc:creator>2008 MLB Preview &#171; The ReclinerGM Sports Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=85#comment-433</guid>
		<description>[...] Boston Red Sox [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Boston Red Sox [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: World Series &#187; 2008 MLB Preview: Boston Red Sox</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/2008-preview-boston-red-sox/#comment-432</link>
		<dc:creator>World Series &#187; 2008 MLB Preview: Boston Red Sox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 18:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=85#comment-432</guid>
		<description>[...] The ReclinerGM Sports Blog wrote an interesting post today on 2008 MLB Preview: Boston Red SoxHere&#8217;s a quick excerptThey added nothing to the team, and I’m one that believes a whole lot has to go your way to win a World Series, and without a historically dominant team, it’s almost impossible to repeat&#8230;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The ReclinerGM Sports Blog wrote an interesting post today on 2008 MLB Preview: Boston Red SoxHere&#8217;s a quick excerptThey added nothing to the team, and I’m one that believes a whole lot has to go your way to win a World Series, and without a historically dominant team, it’s almost impossible to repeat&#8230;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenny</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/2008-preview-boston-red-sox/#comment-431</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=85#comment-431</guid>
		<description>To Gargs- While I agree Japanese pitchers usally do well the 1st year or then fall off, and Dice-K is still unproven, most Japanese pitchers who came over relied heavily on deception more so then stuff. Now Dice-K dosent have the greatest arsenal, but he does have good stuff and dosent rely on deception and hiding the ball. But we will se who is right and who&#039;s wrong at the end of the season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Gargs- While I agree Japanese pitchers usally do well the 1st year or then fall off, and Dice-K is still unproven, most Japanese pitchers who came over relied heavily on deception more so then stuff. Now Dice-K dosent have the greatest arsenal, but he does have good stuff and dosent rely on deception and hiding the ball. But we will se who is right and who&#8217;s wrong at the end of the season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GARGS</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/2008-preview-boston-red-sox/#comment-430</link>
		<dc:creator>GARGS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=85#comment-430</guid>
		<description>Woops, by Carlos I meant Carlos Silva</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woops, by Carlos I meant Carlos Silva</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GARGS</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/2008-preview-boston-red-sox/#comment-429</link>
		<dc:creator>GARGS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=85#comment-429</guid>
		<description>In a day and age where Carlos signs an 8 figure contract, I think your comment about a good 5th starter being able to stand up straight is very fitting, however it&#039;s not a given that Wakefield will even be able to do that.

Well, with that said, I&#039;m eager to see the rest of your rankings to see how you compare the various the rotations.  I won&#039;t even pretend to have put in a fraction of the thought that you have but the fact that Bucholz and Lester are so unproven and Wakefield so old, I would have to think that rotations like SD, NYM, LAA, and Arizona are just as good as Boston.

Keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a day and age where Carlos signs an 8 figure contract, I think your comment about a good 5th starter being able to stand up straight is very fitting, however it&#8217;s not a given that Wakefield will even be able to do that.</p>
<p>Well, with that said, I&#8217;m eager to see the rest of your rankings to see how you compare the various the rotations.  I won&#8217;t even pretend to have put in a fraction of the thought that you have but the fact that Bucholz and Lester are so unproven and Wakefield so old, I would have to think that rotations like SD, NYM, LAA, and Arizona are just as good as Boston.</p>
<p>Keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/2008-preview-boston-red-sox/#comment-428</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=85#comment-428</guid>
		<description>A couple things....

- the top 5 or so rotations in the MLB were very bunched together and could really be interchangible.
- i did do the rankings before schilling got hurt. instead of re-ordering everything, i went back and gave him the lowest score possible. However, Dice-K, Lester and Wakefield all got high scores are 3-4-5 starters.
- I think Dice-K will be better this year than last, and his dip will come next year. He tired at the end of the year.
- I think Lester will be very good this year (for a 4th starter) and graded him accordingly.
- any team with a 5th starter that can stand up straight (wakefield in this case) gets a high grade.
- so Boston benefitted from a dominant ace, and very good depth 3-5.

also - i never said &quot;lock&quot; anywhere. no one is a &quot;lock&quot; to make the playoffs this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple things&#8230;.</p>
<p>- the top 5 or so rotations in the MLB were very bunched together and could really be interchangible.<br />
- i did do the rankings before schilling got hurt. instead of re-ordering everything, i went back and gave him the lowest score possible. However, Dice-K, Lester and Wakefield all got high scores are 3-4-5 starters.<br />
- I think Dice-K will be better this year than last, and his dip will come next year. He tired at the end of the year.<br />
- I think Lester will be very good this year (for a 4th starter) and graded him accordingly.<br />
- any team with a 5th starter that can stand up straight (wakefield in this case) gets a high grade.<br />
- so Boston benefitted from a dominant ace, and very good depth 3-5.</p>
<p>also &#8211; i never said &#8220;lock&#8221; anywhere. no one is a &#8220;lock&#8221; to make the playoffs this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GARGS</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/2008-preview-boston-red-sox/#comment-427</link>
		<dc:creator>GARGS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 05:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=85#comment-427</guid>
		<description>Did you do your rankings before Schilling went down?  I hope so because there is no way Beckett, Dice-K, Buchholz, Wakefield, and Lester is the 2nd best rotation in MLB, not even close.  Bucholz has three career starts, Lester&#039;s career ERA is almost 5, and Japenese pitchers always seem to get &quot;figured out&quot; after initial success.  Beckett is dynamite when healthy but he is not that far removed from his 5.01 ERA in 2006.  And that&#039;s not to mention Tim Wakefield.  While the Sox are formidable any way you look at it, I don&#039;t think they&#039;re a &quot;lock&quot; for anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you do your rankings before Schilling went down?  I hope so because there is no way Beckett, Dice-K, Buchholz, Wakefield, and Lester is the 2nd best rotation in MLB, not even close.  Bucholz has three career starts, Lester&#8217;s career ERA is almost 5, and Japenese pitchers always seem to get &#8220;figured out&#8221; after initial success.  Beckett is dynamite when healthy but he is not that far removed from his 5.01 ERA in 2006.  And that&#8217;s not to mention Tim Wakefield.  While the Sox are formidable any way you look at it, I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;re a &#8220;lock&#8221; for anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
