<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sixers Lose a Tough One at Home to Orlando &#8211; 4 Reasons Why</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reclinergm.com/sixers-lose-a-tough-one-at-home-to-orlando-4-reasons-why/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/sixers-lose-a-tough-one-at-home-to-orlando-4-reasons-why/</link>
	<description>Philly sports blog for diehard Sixers &#38; Phillies fans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 03:49:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave T</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/sixers-lose-a-tough-one-at-home-to-orlando-4-reasons-why/#comment-7980</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 20:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=2884#comment-7980</guid>
		<description>Dannie:   You&#039;re right, it sounds like we just have different philosophies when it comes to certain things.  Let&#039;s hope we never wind up as co-coaches of the same team, they&#039;d be a mess with our mixed messages!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dannie:   You&#8217;re right, it sounds like we just have different philosophies when it comes to certain things.  Let&#8217;s hope we never wind up as co-coaches of the same team, they&#8217;d be a mess with our mixed messages!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Greek</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/sixers-lose-a-tough-one-at-home-to-orlando-4-reasons-why/#comment-7967</link>
		<dc:creator>The Greek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 15:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=2884#comment-7967</guid>
		<description>Guy the reason Iggy misses layups is because if he isn&#039;t dunking he is a weak finisher.   I know it&#039;s hard to believe that a guy who can jump like Iggy can be a bad finisher but it&#039;s true.  We should bring in Armon Gilliam to teach everyone how to shoot a baby hook!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guy the reason Iggy misses layups is because if he isn&#8217;t dunking he is a weak finisher.   I know it&#8217;s hard to believe that a guy who can jump like Iggy can be a bad finisher but it&#8217;s true.  We should bring in Armon Gilliam to teach everyone how to shoot a baby hook!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dannie</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/sixers-lose-a-tough-one-at-home-to-orlando-4-reasons-why/#comment-7966</link>
		<dc:creator>Dannie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 14:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=2884#comment-7966</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Dave T&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; - We will just have to disagree.  We have different views on certain things basketball related.  Much of which probably has to do with our personal basketball background -  as players, experience with coaches we played for and talk to etc. Which is fine.  

For example the whole lay up thing.  Sure a lay up missed is on the player but if you have a player that misses multiple lay ups or a team that misses multiple lay ups that is on the coach to make that right.  If you have players that miss lay ups late in games habitually that is also on the coach.  Particularly it means you have a conditioning issue which often times leads to a lack of focus issue.  Those things can be corrected by the coach.  If it can&#039;t what is the point of having one.

I was going to prepare this long, long response but I decided against it.  Instead I will address some of what you are saying in short posts because they are things I have wanted to write about anyway.

And Dave, don&#039;t worry about coming after me.  I didn&#039;t read that at all.  You were just attacking my comments which is all good.  We just don&#039;t like personal attacks here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>Dave T</em></strong> &#8211; We will just have to disagree.  We have different views on certain things basketball related.  Much of which probably has to do with our personal basketball background -  as players, experience with coaches we played for and talk to etc. Which is fine.  </p>
<p>For example the whole lay up thing.  Sure a lay up missed is on the player but if you have a player that misses multiple lay ups or a team that misses multiple lay ups that is on the coach to make that right.  If you have players that miss lay ups late in games habitually that is also on the coach.  Particularly it means you have a conditioning issue which often times leads to a lack of focus issue.  Those things can be corrected by the coach.  If it can&#8217;t what is the point of having one.</p>
<p>I was going to prepare this long, long response but I decided against it.  Instead I will address some of what you are saying in short posts because they are things I have wanted to write about anyway.</p>
<p>And Dave, don&#8217;t worry about coming after me.  I didn&#8217;t read that at all.  You were just attacking my comments which is all good.  We just don&#8217;t like personal attacks here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jjg</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/sixers-lose-a-tough-one-at-home-to-orlando-4-reasons-why/#comment-7965</link>
		<dc:creator>jjg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 13:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=2884#comment-7965</guid>
		<description>He&#039;s #1 in rebounds because he&#039;s &lt;strong&gt;NOT&lt;/strong&gt; a 2 guard.  2 guard&#039;s main 
role is to score:  17, 24, 31 &amp; 37 rankings in scoring/shooting categories indicate his play has been, for the most part, rank.  An unconventional player, especially when the ball is in his hands, whose sum is less than his parts imo.  That position has to be upgraded somehow, though big contract muddies the water.     </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s #1 in rebounds because he&#8217;s <strong>NOT</strong> a 2 guard.  2 guard&#8217;s main <br />
role is to score:  17, 24, 31 &amp; 37 rankings in scoring/shooting categories indicate his play has been, for the most part, rank.  An unconventional player, especially when the ball is in his hands, whose sum is less than his parts imo.  That position has to be upgraded somehow, though big contract muddies the water.     </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deepsixersuede</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/sixers-lose-a-tough-one-at-home-to-orlando-4-reasons-why/#comment-7964</link>
		<dc:creator>deepsixersuede</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 12:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=2884#comment-7964</guid>
		<description>Iggy 2 guard rankings through 15 games; reb.-[#1] ; ass.-[#4] ; steals- [#5] ; blocks- [#5] ; turn.-[#5] ; ppg.-[ #17] ;f.g.%-[#24] ; f.t.%-[#31] ; 3pt.%-[#37] ; some good,some bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iggy 2 guard rankings through 15 games; reb.-[#1] ; ass.-[#4] ; steals- [#5] ; blocks- [#5] ; turn.-[#5] ; ppg.-[ #17] ;f.g.%-[#24] ; f.t.%-[#31] ; 3pt.%-[#37] ; some good,some bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deepsixersuede</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/sixers-lose-a-tough-one-at-home-to-orlando-4-reasons-why/#comment-7962</link>
		<dc:creator>deepsixersuede</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 03:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=2884#comment-7962</guid>
		<description>Dannie, Sometimes a player hits a tough shot to be you,kudos to Lewis. After watching it over I expected a dump down to Howard after the switch, something that was a surer thing than Lewis!s 3. We need to put 48 hard minutes together Friday, these short spurts are killing me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dannie, Sometimes a player hits a tough shot to be you,kudos to Lewis. After watching it over I expected a dump down to Howard after the switch, something that was a surer thing than Lewis!s 3. We need to put 48 hard minutes together Friday, these short spurts are killing me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave T</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/sixers-lose-a-tough-one-at-home-to-orlando-4-reasons-why/#comment-7961</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 02:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=2884#comment-7961</guid>
		<description>
(above...by backups I meant buckets).  


Dannie, didn&#039;t mean to come after you like that haha, I had a long drive today off not a lot of sleep, hope I didn&#039;t take a crappy tone there.  But I just really disagree with a lot of what you said in your response to my earlier post.   

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(above&#8230;by backups I meant buckets).  </p>
<p>Dannie, didn&#8217;t mean to come after you like that haha, I had a long drive today off not a lot of sleep, hope I didn&#8217;t take a crappy tone there.  But I just really disagree with a lot of what you said in your response to my earlier post.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave T</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/sixers-lose-a-tough-one-at-home-to-orlando-4-reasons-why/#comment-7960</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 02:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=2884#comment-7960</guid>
		<description>Dannie:  Maybe I gave the wrong impression, but I didn&#039;t mention the last play of the game in any of my comments about defensive rotations.  I&#039;m fine with the way Thad played it, and feel that was the Magic making a nice play, as opposed to a defensive lapse on our end.


Also, I&#039;ve always felt things like &quot;missed layups&quot; are something much more on the individual player, and not on the coach.  A coach can repeat a mantra of how many layups are missed repeatedly, but often this will have no concrete effect on whether this improves or not.  It is up to the player to practice specific individual drills with hand-footwork around the basket so that any layup type shot...reverse layups, going off the correct foot, positioning, attacking with strength, ability to use both hands equally, scoring from the baseline and behind the basket...will come naturally and as easy as breathing 


A coach has far less control over this than an individual player...he can only do so much with a missed-layup type of play.  Screaming about it tends not to help to much.  I feel when it comes to dumbass plays at the end of games, the only thing you can do is mention it, point it out, explain what should have happened, and then move on.  
My philosophy tends to center around the fact that games are not won or lost in the 4th quarter off one or two plays...be them tiny mistakes or true bonehead plays.  I think there&#039;s an unnecessary fixation in basketball that hiccups in the 4th quarter are what causes the loss.  To me, it&#039;s much more a conglomeration of many mistakes made throughout the game.  I also think this is what a coach has the most direct control of.  Hence, I think a coach is wasting his time when he gripes about a botched play or two...that type of stuff will happen.  


Where a coach should be SCREAMING about and pushing in the team&#039;s face is the same types of errors that have been made numerous times throughout a game, especially if they are caused from a. lack of consistency  b. lack of enthusiasm  c. lack of flat out not knowing what to do/confusion  d. lack of fundamentals when executing.  


To me, in the Orlando game, this was defensive rotations.  In the first half, this was ATROCIOUS.  We need to be a top 5-7 defensive team in order for our parts to play at a quicker pace and overcome our shooting deficiencies.  This Orlando game, we did not do this.  This is the reason the Magic was so effective scoring against us, and a reason they hit long range shots against us.  


I don&#039;t see how you can argue this wasn&#039;t a huge cog having to do with this individual game...just because it represents a larger problem in many games of the season doesn&#039;t mean it didn&#039;t affect last night&#039;s score.  It is exactly the recurring problems from one game to another that tangibly effects the outcome of each game more then any one timeout situation, one missed jumpshot or botched play.  


Also, just because the Magic are a good offensive team doesn&#039;t excuse our inability to make defensive rotations.  I&#039;d argue we should be putting forth MORE energy and mental toughness on this one aspect of defense when it comes to the big games against strong offensive teams.  So what if Dwight Howard is doubled teamed often?  I&#039;m not arguing it will take longer to help or get out to the perimeter when that&#039;s the case...I&#039;m saying that we weren&#039;t doing this at all, or far too late, and it had nothing to do with the fact we were helping in the interior sometimes.


Also, the specific 7-8 plays I&#039;m referring to happened when we weren&#039;t double teaming anyone, which makes the total look of team confusion when we take 10 seconds to rotate to the three point line, or step up to help when an opposing player drives, all the more embarrassing.  This stuff is just inexcusable, and what worries me is I have barely seen any improvement in this area in 15 games.


Lastly...I disagree with your defense of the box score with the Magic&#039;s three point shooting.  I don&#039;t think you can compare our defensive effort to their normal three point shooting as a team.  Who cares what their normal % is vs. what we held them to.  What matters is HOW we did it.  And the way we held them to a decent % was because we got friggin lucky, not because of skill.  Rashard Lewis, Hedo and Reddick can hit 3&#039;s at a 40% clip or above.  Pietrus is at 35% or above.  We let these guys have FIVE blatently wide open threes where not one Sixer uniform was NEAR them.  This is shitty D, and from 40% long bomb shooters, total luck their shot was off.  


I know I sound like a broken record here, but defense should be, and needs to be, our strong point.  A team should look like they play defense together as one organism, that is shifting, helping, rotating and constantly moving and communicating based on what the other team is doing.  It requires not only the technical profficiency but will and desire to do so.  


We are showing neither of these two categories in the majority of our games.  The Magic scored many easy backups because we are not helping each other out on D when one man gets burned or is occupied helping someone else.  This is why we lost.  And if we show the same lack of defensive teamwork and cohesion against Boston, then the green machine is going to slaughter us.











</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dannie:  Maybe I gave the wrong impression, but I didn&#8217;t mention the last play of the game in any of my comments about defensive rotations.  I&#8217;m fine with the way Thad played it, and feel that was the Magic making a nice play, as opposed to a defensive lapse on our end.</p>
<p>Also, I&#8217;ve always felt things like &#8220;missed layups&#8221; are something much more on the individual player, and not on the coach.  A coach can repeat a mantra of how many layups are missed repeatedly, but often this will have no concrete effect on whether this improves or not.  It is up to the player to practice specific individual drills with hand-footwork around the basket so that any layup type shot&#8230;reverse layups, going off the correct foot, positioning, attacking with strength, ability to use both hands equally, scoring from the baseline and behind the basket&#8230;will come naturally and as easy as breathing </p>
<p>A coach has far less control over this than an individual player&#8230;he can only do so much with a missed-layup type of play.  Screaming about it tends not to help to much.  I feel when it comes to dumbass plays at the end of games, the only thing you can do is mention it, point it out, explain what should have happened, and then move on.  <br />
My philosophy tends to center around the fact that games are not won or lost in the 4th quarter off one or two plays&#8230;be them tiny mistakes or true bonehead plays.  I think there&#8217;s an unnecessary fixation in basketball that hiccups in the 4th quarter are what causes the loss.  To me, it&#8217;s much more a conglomeration of many mistakes made throughout the game.  I also think this is what a coach has the most direct control of.  Hence, I think a coach is wasting his time when he gripes about a botched play or two&#8230;that type of stuff will happen.  </p>
<p>Where a coach should be SCREAMING about and pushing in the team&#8217;s face is the same types of errors that have been made numerous times throughout a game, especially if they are caused from a. lack of consistency  b. lack of enthusiasm  c. lack of flat out not knowing what to do/confusion  d. lack of fundamentals when executing.  </p>
<p>To me, in the Orlando game, this was defensive rotations.  In the first half, this was ATROCIOUS.  We need to be a top 5-7 defensive team in order for our parts to play at a quicker pace and overcome our shooting deficiencies.  This Orlando game, we did not do this.  This is the reason the Magic was so effective scoring against us, and a reason they hit long range shots against us.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see how you can argue this wasn&#8217;t a huge cog having to do with this individual game&#8230;just because it represents a larger problem in many games of the season doesn&#8217;t mean it didn&#8217;t affect last night&#8217;s score.  It is exactly the recurring problems from one game to another that tangibly effects the outcome of each game more then any one timeout situation, one missed jumpshot or botched play.  </p>
<p>Also, just because the Magic are a good offensive team doesn&#8217;t excuse our inability to make defensive rotations.  I&#8217;d argue we should be putting forth MORE energy and mental toughness on this one aspect of defense when it comes to the big games against strong offensive teams.  So what if Dwight Howard is doubled teamed often?  I&#8217;m not arguing it will take longer to help or get out to the perimeter when that&#8217;s the case&#8230;I&#8217;m saying that we weren&#8217;t doing this at all, or far too late, and it had nothing to do with the fact we were helping in the interior sometimes.</p>
<p>Also, the specific 7-8 plays I&#8217;m referring to happened when we weren&#8217;t double teaming anyone, which makes the total look of team confusion when we take 10 seconds to rotate to the three point line, or step up to help when an opposing player drives, all the more embarrassing.  This stuff is just inexcusable, and what worries me is I have barely seen any improvement in this area in 15 games.</p>
<p>Lastly&#8230;I disagree with your defense of the box score with the Magic&#8217;s three point shooting.  I don&#8217;t think you can compare our defensive effort to their normal three point shooting as a team.  Who cares what their normal % is vs. what we held them to.  What matters is HOW we did it.  And the way we held them to a decent % was because we got friggin lucky, not because of skill.  Rashard Lewis, Hedo and Reddick can hit 3&#8217;s at a 40% clip or above.  Pietrus is at 35% or above.  We let these guys have FIVE blatently wide open threes where not one Sixer uniform was NEAR them.  This is shitty D, and from 40% long bomb shooters, total luck their shot was off.  </p>
<p>I know I sound like a broken record here, but defense should be, and needs to be, our strong point.  A team should look like they play defense together as one organism, that is shifting, helping, rotating and constantly moving and communicating based on what the other team is doing.  It requires not only the technical profficiency but will and desire to do so.  </p>
<p>We are showing neither of these two categories in the majority of our games.  The Magic scored many easy backups because we are not helping each other out on D when one man gets burned or is occupied helping someone else.  This is why we lost.  And if we show the same lack of defensive teamwork and cohesion against Boston, then the green machine is going to slaughter us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bski</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/sixers-lose-a-tough-one-at-home-to-orlando-4-reasons-why/#comment-7959</link>
		<dc:creator>bski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 21:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=2884#comment-7959</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Dannie&lt;/strong&gt;...Thanks for laying it out like that.  You also bring up a valid and intriguing point.  We do not know how much of our difficulties and things we call into question are attributable to the players making &quot;mistakes&quot; and how much is on Cheeks and the coaches for poor preparation as well as faulty recognition and game planning among other things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dannie</strong>&#8230;Thanks for laying it out like that.  You also bring up a valid and intriguing point.  We do not know how much of our difficulties and things we call into question are attributable to the players making &#8220;mistakes&#8221; and how much is on Cheeks and the coaches for poor preparation as well as faulty recognition and game planning among other things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Greek</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/sixers-lose-a-tough-one-at-home-to-orlando-4-reasons-why/#comment-7958</link>
		<dc:creator>The Greek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 21:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=2884#comment-7958</guid>
		<description>Ofcourse he didn&#039;t get the ball late in the game even though he was hot, this is a Mo Cheeks coached team.  He is a black hole, one of our many.

Dave T, its&#039; funny I was thinking about you when Speights came in and played some excellent D! lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ofcourse he didn&#8217;t get the ball late in the game even though he was hot, this is a Mo Cheeks coached team.  He is a black hole, one of our many.</p>
<p>Dave T, its&#8217; funny I was thinking about you when Speights came in and played some excellent D! lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
