<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sixers Blow Another 3rd Quarter Lead &#8211; Lose to Dallas by 10</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reclinergm.com/sixers-vs-dallas-can-they-get-a-win-against-a-good-team/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/sixers-vs-dallas-can-they-get-a-win-against-a-good-team/</link>
	<description>Philly sports blog for diehard Sixers &#38; Phillies fans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 03:49:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Zack</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/sixers-vs-dallas-can-they-get-a-win-against-a-good-team/#comment-10031</link>
		<dc:creator>Zack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 21:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=3512#comment-10031</guid>
		<description>Stefansky, DiLeo: A win vs. the Clippers, a good fight versus the Mavs, this is good, let&#039;s build on this.  Focus on the next game, the next opponent.  First off, look at your record, then your players.  I&#039;ve got a point to rally around: Remember Rodney!  He thought he was good enough to get playing time, but Willie Green outplayed him in preseason and in practice, and when he did get in a game he seemed to only focus on was getting his three-pointers up there.  All the fans were down on him, including me (but not suede).  But he slowly turned things around.  He became more concerned with making plays on both the offensive and defensive end, and started buying into the concept of doing the little things teams need to do to win.  And before you know it, he was helping the team win games.

Look - if Carney can do it, this team can do it!  Come on, Sixers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stefansky, DiLeo: A win vs. the Clippers, a good fight versus the Mavs, this is good, let&#8217;s build on this.  Focus on the next game, the next opponent.  First off, look at your record, then your players.  I&#8217;ve got a point to rally around: Remember Rodney!  He thought he was good enough to get playing time, but Willie Green outplayed him in preseason and in practice, and when he did get in a game he seemed to only focus on was getting his three-pointers up there.  All the fans were down on him, including me (but not suede).  But he slowly turned things around.  He became more concerned with making plays on both the offensive and defensive end, and started buying into the concept of doing the little things teams need to do to win.  And before you know it, he was helping the team win games.</p>
<p>Look &#8211; if Carney can do it, this team can do it!  Come on, Sixers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bski</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/sixers-vs-dallas-can-they-get-a-win-against-a-good-team/#comment-10028</link>
		<dc:creator>bski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 21:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=3512#comment-10028</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;sfw.&lt;/strong&gt;..I read that too.  I don&#039;t know if Stefanski, DiLeo, and the rest truly believe that focus, determination, and better execution will turn this group into winners or if they are just trying to get the most out of what they have.

&lt;strong&gt;jjg&lt;/strong&gt;...Since there are several reasons for our &quot;struggles&quot;, I don&#039;t need poor shooting to be at the top of the list.  You pointed out a couple good ones, so I could live with poor shooting being in the top 3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>sfw.</strong>..I read that too.  I don&#8217;t know if Stefanski, DiLeo, and the rest truly believe that focus, determination, and better execution will turn this group into winners or if they are just trying to get the most out of what they have.</p>
<p><strong>jjg</strong>&#8230;Since there are several reasons for our &#8220;struggles&#8221;, I don&#8217;t need poor shooting to be at the top of the list.  You pointed out a couple good ones, so I could live with poor shooting being in the top 3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jjg</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/sixers-vs-dallas-can-they-get-a-win-against-a-good-team/#comment-10027</link>
		<dc:creator>jjg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 20:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=3512#comment-10027</guid>
		<description>I want my starters to look like they know what to do with the ball -without rushing, panicking, dominating it, dribbling/pounding it, kicking it, throwing it out of bounds or into an opponent&#039;s hands.  I therefore nominate the following as starters for Spurs game tonight:  &lt;strong&gt;Willie Green, Royal Ivey, Thad Young, Donyell Marshall &amp; Marreese Speights&lt;/strong&gt;.  Let the egomaniacal, multi-millionaire &#039;geek squad&#039; (persistent, sourpussed referee-baiters) sit and watch for a loooong stretch ... might learn a thing or two about pace, humility and a sum being greater than individual parts.

Of course, there&#039;s zero chance of my hypothetical occuring, given braintrust&#039;s caution and timidity towards upsetting &quot;stars&#039;&#039; sensibilities and emotional balance/psychological comfort, along with business concerns for customer expectations.  Another L, right this way.  &quot;Remember the Alamo!&quot;  

Disagree with you bski:  Sixers&#039; poor record is more the result of highly-sporadic defensive play and sloppy ball management than shooting inaccuracy, though the latter factor is certainly contributive.  Bob Cousy, K.C. Jones and Bill Russell couldn&#039;t shoot - but their Celtic squads won due to great team play and defensive diligence when it mattered.  Sixers are emotionally immature and mentally soft, not up to strong challenges.  Yes, watch these athletes fly often - out of position, and off the handle!

To close on an upbeat note:  After the Sixers canned their nepotistically-inserted head coach, Cheeks, for losing the team&#039;s ear through basic incompetence, their replacement head coach, DiLeo 
(who learned defensive concepts from Paul Westhead - egad!), has  
instilled staunch West Germanic dual gender championship ideas that pre-date Live Aid at JFK , and he&#039;s steered the team to the 19th best record in the NBA!  &quot;Mr. Gorbachev, tear down that wall!&quot;    
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want my starters to look like they know what to do with the ball -without rushing, panicking, dominating it, dribbling/pounding it, kicking it, throwing it out of bounds or into an opponent&#8217;s hands.  I therefore nominate the following as starters for Spurs game tonight:  <strong>Willie Green, Royal Ivey, Thad Young, Donyell Marshall &amp; Marreese Speights</strong>.  Let the egomaniacal, multi-millionaire &#8216;geek squad&#8217; (persistent, sourpussed referee-baiters) sit and watch for a loooong stretch &#8230; might learn a thing or two about pace, humility and a sum being greater than individual parts.</p>
<p>Of course, there&#8217;s zero chance of my hypothetical occuring, given braintrust&#8217;s caution and timidity towards upsetting &#8220;stars&#8221; sensibilities and emotional balance/psychological comfort, along with business concerns for customer expectations.  Another L, right this way.  &#8220;Remember the Alamo!&#8221;  </p>
<p>Disagree with you bski:  Sixers&#8217; poor record is more the result of highly-sporadic defensive play and sloppy ball management than shooting inaccuracy, though the latter factor is certainly contributive.  Bob Cousy, K.C. Jones and Bill Russell couldn&#8217;t shoot &#8211; but their Celtic squads won due to great team play and defensive diligence when it mattered.  Sixers are emotionally immature and mentally soft, not up to strong challenges.  Yes, watch these athletes fly often &#8211; out of position, and off the handle!</p>
<p>To close on an upbeat note:  After the Sixers canned their nepotistically-inserted head coach, Cheeks, for losing the team&#8217;s ear through basic incompetence, their replacement head coach, DiLeo <br />
(who learned defensive concepts from Paul Westhead &#8211; egad!), has  <br />
instilled staunch West Germanic dual gender championship ideas that pre-date Live Aid at JFK , and he&#8217;s steered the team to the 19th best record in the NBA!  &#8220;Mr. Gorbachev, tear down that wall!&#8221;    <br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sfw</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/sixers-vs-dallas-can-they-get-a-win-against-a-good-team/#comment-10026</link>
		<dc:creator>sfw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 20:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=3512#comment-10026</guid>
		<description>Sounds like they are working on that offense. From the daily news.


Assistant coach Jim Lynam, who has been an NBA head coach and general manager, suggested that eight games &quot;is not a good sample&quot; to make any judgments on DiLeo as a head coach, but he described DiLeo as &quot;very organized and very thorough, and I think those are two different things.&quot;
&quot;I think he has tried to present things to the players in a fashion where they appreciate the importance of those two things, where they understand exactly what they&#039;re trying to do with offensive or defensive concepts, and at the offensive end understanding second and even third options on a play, that it doesn&#039;t have to evolve into a one-on-one play all the time,&quot; Lynam said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like they are working on that offense. From the daily news.</p>
<p>Assistant coach Jim Lynam, who has been an NBA head coach and general manager, suggested that eight games &#8220;is not a good sample&#8221; to make any judgments on DiLeo as a head coach, but he described DiLeo as &#8220;very organized and very thorough, and I think those are two different things.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;I think he has tried to present things to the players in a fashion where they appreciate the importance of those two things, where they understand exactly what they&#8217;re trying to do with offensive or defensive concepts, and at the offensive end understanding second and even third options on a play, that it doesn&#8217;t have to evolve into a one-on-one play all the time,&#8221; Lynam said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sfw</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/sixers-vs-dallas-can-they-get-a-win-against-a-good-team/#comment-10023</link>
		<dc:creator>sfw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 19:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=3512#comment-10023</guid>
		<description>Dannie, Wasn&#039;t that how Larry Brown used Theo?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dannie, Wasn&#8217;t that how Larry Brown used Theo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dannie</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/sixers-vs-dallas-can-they-get-a-win-against-a-good-team/#comment-10019</link>
		<dc:creator>Dannie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 18:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=3512#comment-10019</guid>
		<description>Theo doesn&#039;t help with ball movement either.  When the offense went stagnate Sammy wasn&#039;t even on the floor so I am not sure how he is to blame for that.

&lt;strong&gt;Sam isn&#039;t the damn problem on offense.&lt;/strong&gt; 

The Sixers play pick up basketball on offense.  They have no structure when their talent level dictates structure is necessary/mandatory to have consistent success.  I would be fine with an open style offense where the mentality is &quot;take em&quot; if the had really good individual offensive players there were actually good at &quot;taking em.&quot;  They don&#039;t.  Lou is probably the best and he isn&#039;t even all that great or consistent with it.  

Coaching has all the impact on offensive system and that is were a lot of blame should be directed.  

It&#039;s not Sam&#039;s fault guys can&#039;t shoot from the perimeter, have limited offensive games and make bad decisions when the game is close and the Sixers need the guys with the ball to make plays.  He does exactly what he is suppose to do most of the time.  Get out of the way.  

People say he is floating on the perimeter like that is a bad thing.  Yes, he is because he shouldn&#039;t be attempted to establish post position (do you want him doing that?) OR clogging driving lanes (would you rather him do that?).  

Sam would be maximized offensively as a short corner and elbow shooter as a release if nothing is there on drives to the basket and when his man naturally helps protect the rim. Keep it simple.  Catch and shoot if you are open. That&#039;s it.  That is were I would position Sam offensively.  Those shots I think he can make consistently when open (not when he catches with his back to the basket then faces up and shoots it like he does now) and would be best served focusing his individual development time on offensively - not low post work.  I would feel much more comfortable with him taking those open shots than him catching with his back to the basket or trying to squeeze passes to him in traffic.

Now I have now clue what the Sixers coaching staff works on but that&#039;s what I would do with Sam.  Turn him into a short corner and elbow shooting big.  That way he isn&#039;t clogging the lane or taking post position from someone better suited to be down there.  Also when he is in the short corner he is in perfect position to continue to receive the lobs when guys penetrate and his man helps.  At the elbow he is in good position to follow up misses diving down the lane for offensive boards.  Then keep it simple. Rebound, defend and screen.  Period.  Pipe dream?  Maybe, maybe not.  He isn&#039;t a post player never has been and never will be, he&#039;s just not.  Very rarely do bigs who come to the game late develop the footwork and moves necessary to be successful in the post.  I think the Sixers early on and maybe even still try to develop his post game. I personally just never think that is going to happen.  But I do believe he could make shots at the foul line and short corner when open and no pressure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Theo doesn&#8217;t help with ball movement either.  When the offense went stagnate Sammy wasn&#8217;t even on the floor so I am not sure how he is to blame for that.</p>
<p><strong>Sam isn&#8217;t the damn problem on offense.</strong> </p>
<p>The Sixers play pick up basketball on offense.  They have no structure when their talent level dictates structure is necessary/mandatory to have consistent success.  I would be fine with an open style offense where the mentality is &#8220;take em&#8221; if the had really good individual offensive players there were actually good at &#8220;taking em.&#8221;  They don&#8217;t.  Lou is probably the best and he isn&#8217;t even all that great or consistent with it.  </p>
<p>Coaching has all the impact on offensive system and that is were a lot of blame should be directed.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not Sam&#8217;s fault guys can&#8217;t shoot from the perimeter, have limited offensive games and make bad decisions when the game is close and the Sixers need the guys with the ball to make plays.  He does exactly what he is suppose to do most of the time.  Get out of the way.  </p>
<p>People say he is floating on the perimeter like that is a bad thing.  Yes, he is because he shouldn&#8217;t be attempted to establish post position (do you want him doing that?) OR clogging driving lanes (would you rather him do that?).  </p>
<p>Sam would be maximized offensively as a short corner and elbow shooter as a release if nothing is there on drives to the basket and when his man naturally helps protect the rim. Keep it simple.  Catch and shoot if you are open. That&#8217;s it.  That is were I would position Sam offensively.  Those shots I think he can make consistently when open (not when he catches with his back to the basket then faces up and shoots it like he does now) and would be best served focusing his individual development time on offensively &#8211; not low post work.  I would feel much more comfortable with him taking those open shots than him catching with his back to the basket or trying to squeeze passes to him in traffic.</p>
<p>Now I have now clue what the Sixers coaching staff works on but that&#8217;s what I would do with Sam.  Turn him into a short corner and elbow shooting big.  That way he isn&#8217;t clogging the lane or taking post position from someone better suited to be down there.  Also when he is in the short corner he is in perfect position to continue to receive the lobs when guys penetrate and his man helps.  At the elbow he is in good position to follow up misses diving down the lane for offensive boards.  Then keep it simple. Rebound, defend and screen.  Period.  Pipe dream?  Maybe, maybe not.  He isn&#8217;t a post player never has been and never will be, he&#8217;s just not.  Very rarely do bigs who come to the game late develop the footwork and moves necessary to be successful in the post.  I think the Sixers early on and maybe even still try to develop his post game. I personally just never think that is going to happen.  But I do believe he could make shots at the foul line and short corner when open and no pressure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bski</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/sixers-vs-dallas-can-they-get-a-win-against-a-good-team/#comment-10018</link>
		<dc:creator>bski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 18:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=3512#comment-10018</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Greek&lt;/strong&gt;.....I think starting Willie is for the present.  Other than Speights, I can&#039;t think of anyone who&#039;s time on the floor is based more on the future than on right now.  

As for everyone else, I think the coaching staff asks themselves what gives us the best chance to win now and we are watching their answer on a daily basis.  That&#039;s why Willie starts, why Iguodala is the go to guy, etc...they figure it&#039;s the best shot we have with what we&#039;ve got.  Not easy to take, I know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Greek</strong>&#8230;..I think starting Willie is for the present.  Other than Speights, I can&#8217;t think of anyone who&#8217;s time on the floor is based more on the future than on right now.  </p>
<p>As for everyone else, I think the coaching staff asks themselves what gives us the best chance to win now and we are watching their answer on a daily basis.  That&#8217;s why Willie starts, why Iguodala is the go to guy, etc&#8230;they figure it&#8217;s the best shot we have with what we&#8217;ve got.  Not easy to take, I know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Greek</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/sixers-vs-dallas-can-they-get-a-win-against-a-good-team/#comment-10017</link>
		<dc:creator>The Greek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 18:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=3512#comment-10017</guid>
		<description>Also I posed this ? to my friend and he was stumped.

Is starting Willie Greene a move for the present or future?  Because for the life of me I just can&#039;t figure it out.  Is the true answer that your team just flat out sucks when you have to start Willie Greene?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also I posed this ? to my friend and he was stumped.</p>
<p>Is starting Willie Greene a move for the present or future?  Because for the life of me I just can&#8217;t figure it out.  Is the true answer that your team just flat out sucks when you have to start Willie Greene?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Greek</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/sixers-vs-dallas-can-they-get-a-win-against-a-good-team/#comment-10016</link>
		<dc:creator>The Greek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 18:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=3512#comment-10016</guid>
		<description>Bski, very funny!  Although if i did see Thad streaking naked down the street, thats the day that I wouldn&#039;t be seeking an autograph!

Dannie, what&#039;s the trade bro?  I am dying in anticipation!

I&#039;m also dying slowly watching this team, year after freakin year just dissapoint me.   Why wasn&#039;t Speights playing yesterday?  I don&#039;t have the energy to bash Sammy anymore, at least not this weekend. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bski, very funny!  Although if i did see Thad streaking naked down the street, thats the day that I wouldn&#8217;t be seeking an autograph!</p>
<p>Dannie, what&#8217;s the trade bro?  I am dying in anticipation!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also dying slowly watching this team, year after freakin year just dissapoint me.   Why wasn&#8217;t Speights playing yesterday?  I don&#8217;t have the energy to bash Sammy anymore, at least not this weekend. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bski</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/sixers-vs-dallas-can-they-get-a-win-against-a-good-team/#comment-10015</link>
		<dc:creator>bski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 17:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=3512#comment-10015</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;sfw.&lt;/strong&gt;..Yeah, the one-on-one stuff drives me nuts.  Too many times I get the feeling that when someone gets the ball on an iso, they have in their head that this &quot;set&quot; is for me, it&#039;s my shot, and I&#039;m taking it, regardless of who is defending me or where I am on the floor.  You can just sense it from them, can&#039;t you?  

Like I said before, if somebody has an advantage (an actual, not a perceived, advantage) &lt;strong&gt;and it&#039;s working for us&lt;/strong&gt; then you definitely keep going back to it.  That was not the case last night.  We (mostly Miller) had a really tough time just getting the ball to Iguodala (it had to be forced in more often than not).  On top of that, Iguodala couldn&#039;t do much with it when he finally got it.  I could see trying it but, after we got nothing out of it the first couple times, we should have stopped trying to force it and gone to something else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>sfw.</strong>..Yeah, the one-on-one stuff drives me nuts.  Too many times I get the feeling that when someone gets the ball on an iso, they have in their head that this &#8220;set&#8221; is for me, it&#8217;s my shot, and I&#8217;m taking it, regardless of who is defending me or where I am on the floor.  You can just sense it from them, can&#8217;t you?  </p>
<p>Like I said before, if somebody has an advantage (an actual, not a perceived, advantage) <strong>and it&#8217;s working for us</strong> then you definitely keep going back to it.  That was not the case last night.  We (mostly Miller) had a really tough time just getting the ball to Iguodala (it had to be forced in more often than not).  On top of that, Iguodala couldn&#8217;t do much with it when he finally got it.  I could see trying it but, after we got nothing out of it the first couple times, we should have stopped trying to force it and gone to something else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
