<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The ReclinerGM&#8217;s 2009 MLB Preview: Milwaukee Brewers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reclinergm.com/the-reclinergms-2009-mlb-preview-milwaukee-brewers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/the-reclinergms-2009-mlb-preview-milwaukee-brewers/</link>
	<description>Philly sports blog for diehard Sixers &#38; Phillies fans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 07:56:28 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ReclinerGM&#8217;s 2009 MLB Preview</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/the-reclinergms-2009-mlb-preview-milwaukee-brewers/#comment-12186</link>
		<dc:creator>ReclinerGM&#8217;s 2009 MLB Preview</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 21:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=4283#comment-12186</guid>
		<description>[...] Milwaukee Brewers [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Milwaukee Brewers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/the-reclinergms-2009-mlb-preview-milwaukee-brewers/#comment-12035</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=4283#comment-12035</guid>
		<description>jkay, Braun is locked up through 2015, so he&#039;s not going anywhere. Also, Pete, I think 5th place is really low for the Brewers. They&#039;ve improved their bullpen, which was awful last season. Interesting note, had Bradon Looper played for the Brewers last season, he would have led their team in innings pitched, at 199.

Finally, I agree that Miller Park is very underrated. I like not having obstructed views and parts of the stadium falling apart around me (cough, Wrigley, cough).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jkay, Braun is locked up through 2015, so he&#8217;s not going anywhere. Also, Pete, I think 5th place is really low for the Brewers. They&#8217;ve improved their bullpen, which was awful last season. Interesting note, had Bradon Looper played for the Brewers last season, he would have led their team in innings pitched, at 199.</p>
<p>Finally, I agree that Miller Park is very underrated. I like not having obstructed views and parts of the stadium falling apart around me (cough, Wrigley, cough).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bski</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/the-reclinergms-2009-mlb-preview-milwaukee-brewers/#comment-11974</link>
		<dc:creator>bski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 20:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=4283#comment-11974</guid>
		<description>Yeah Pete, I know the fact that they played in two very different eras is a big factor.  That&#039;s why I emphasized the walks, strikeouts and obp.  I figured Rollins would trail Yount by a good bit in these areas.  Surprisingly, he does not.  

Plate discipline is an intrinsic thing that is totally under each individual players control regardless of outside factors, such as park size for example.  As such, it cuts across all eras, IMO.  You&#039;ve either got it (or develop it) or you don&#039;t.  The extent to which you have it leads, in turn,  to greater production and better numbers in other areas (of course how much greater&lt;strong&gt; is &lt;/strong&gt;dependent on other factors that exist in your particular era).

Thanks for mentioning the comparisons to Rollins on baseball-reference.com (not bad company for him to be in, btw).  When I was talking about Yount earlier, I got to thinking about who would be comparable to him from this era.  The first guy that popped into my head was Craig Biggio (I should probably save this for the Astros preview but oh well).  I thought of Biggio because of the similar longevity, consistent productivity, and the fact that he also played multiple positions.  Just as Yount played SS for the first 11 years of his career then moved to CF for the last 9, Biggio started out at C (made an all-star team), moved to 2b (made several all-star teams), and finished up in the outfield.  Anyway, I went back to Yount&#039;s page on baseball-reference.com to check and, sure enough, Biggio is #2 on the comparison list, right below Paul Molitor (whom we should be talking about under the Brewers preview.  Maybe a little under the Blue Jays and Twins previews as well when the come up).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah Pete, I know the fact that they played in two very different eras is a big factor.  That&#8217;s why I emphasized the walks, strikeouts and obp.  I figured Rollins would trail Yount by a good bit in these areas.  Surprisingly, he does not.  </p>
<p>Plate discipline is an intrinsic thing that is totally under each individual players control regardless of outside factors, such as park size for example.  As such, it cuts across all eras, IMO.  You&#8217;ve either got it (or develop it) or you don&#8217;t.  The extent to which you have it leads, in turn,  to greater production and better numbers in other areas (of course how much greater<strong> is </strong>dependent on other factors that exist in your particular era).</p>
<p>Thanks for mentioning the comparisons to Rollins on baseball-reference.com (not bad company for him to be in, btw).  When I was talking about Yount earlier, I got to thinking about who would be comparable to him from this era.  The first guy that popped into my head was Craig Biggio (I should probably save this for the Astros preview but oh well).  I thought of Biggio because of the similar longevity, consistent productivity, and the fact that he also played multiple positions.  Just as Yount played SS for the first 11 years of his career then moved to CF for the last 9, Biggio started out at C (made an all-star team), moved to 2b (made several all-star teams), and finished up in the outfield.  Anyway, I went back to Yount&#8217;s page on baseball-reference.com to check and, sure enough, Biggio is #2 on the comparison list, right below Paul Molitor (whom we should be talking about under the Brewers preview.  Maybe a little under the Blue Jays and Twins previews as well when the come up).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/the-reclinergms-2009-mlb-preview-milwaukee-brewers/#comment-11971</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=4283#comment-11971</guid>
		<description>bski-
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;excellent comparison of those two players. &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;your point about the times is big though, as Young led the league more categories, more times than Rollins. (including SLG% one year, which Rollins will never do). &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;on baseball-refernce.com, the player most similar to Rollins at age 29 is Ryne Sandberg, followed by Alan Trammell, Roberto Alomar and HOFer Bobby Doerr. &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bski-</p>
<div>
</div>
<div>excellent comparison of those two players. </div>
<div>
</div>
<div>your point about the times is big though, as Young led the league more categories, more times than Rollins. (including SLG% one year, which Rollins will never do). </div>
<div>
</div>
<div>on baseball-refernce.com, the player most similar to Rollins at age 29 is Ryne Sandberg, followed by Alan Trammell, Roberto Alomar and HOFer Bobby Doerr. </div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bski</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/the-reclinergms-2009-mlb-preview-milwaukee-brewers/#comment-11963</link>
		<dc:creator>bski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=4283#comment-11963</guid>
		<description>I need to correct an error in my previous post.  In the comparison of Yount&#039;s and Rollins&#039; career stats per 162 games, the &lt;strong&gt;second&lt;/strong&gt; OBP listed (.430/.441) is actually &lt;strong&gt;Slugging %&lt;/strong&gt;.  Sorry about that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I need to correct an error in my previous post.  In the comparison of Yount&#8217;s and Rollins&#8217; career stats per 162 games, the <strong>second</strong> OBP listed (.430/.441) is actually <strong>Slugging %</strong>.  Sorry about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bski</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/the-reclinergms-2009-mlb-preview-milwaukee-brewers/#comment-11958</link>
		<dc:creator>bski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=4283#comment-11958</guid>
		<description>Robin Yount was a lot of fun to watch.  He broke in so young (18) and piled up the hits to the point where I thought for a while that he might actually become the &quot;Hit King&quot;.  If memory serves, he was the youngest to reach 1500, 2000, and 2500 hits.  Problem is he &quot;only&quot; played 20 years and his numbers were declining in the 90&#039;s (1990-1993).

I just did a quick check of the stats out of curiosity.  I would say that most people would agree that Yount was a great player (he is in the HOF after all) and was also considered a fantastic offensive shortstop.  You know where I&#039;m going with this, right?  Even though many of us consider Rollins to be a great player and agree that he is the best SS in Phillies history, many of us, myself included, seem to harp on his deficiencies (hits too many fly balls), on what he does not do (draw enough walks), or on what he should be doing more of (hitting more line drives and ground balls and getting on base more).

So, let&#039;s compare Rollin&#039;s numbers to those of Yount.  Here are their numbers over their careers:

Per 162 games (Yount/Rollins)....AB (624/682), Runs (93/109), Hits (178/189), 2b (33/40), 3b (7/12), HR (14/16), RBI (80/70), SB (15/38), CS (6/8), BB (55/55), SO (77/90), BA (.285/.277), OBP (.342/.333), OBP (.430/.441), TB (268/301)

Also, defensively Yount had a career fielding % over 11 years at SS of 0.964 (against a league FP of 0.964), while Rollins has a FP over 8 years at SS of 0.982 (against a league FP of 0.973).

I know that the 80&#039;s and the 00&#039;s are two different eras, but I&#039;d say that Rollins compares pretty well.  What really surprised me were the walk (same as Yount), strikeout (not much worse especially considering Rollins struck out over 100 times in each of his first three full seasons), and the OBP (better the Yount) numbers.  I realize that Yount played 20 years and Rollins has a long way to go to match Yount&#039;s consistency, but I am pleasantly surprised at how well he compares.  I wanted to pull out Yount&#039;s stats specifically for the years he played SS (his first 11 seasons), but I couldn&#039;t so I went with career averages over 162 games instead (which include Yount&#039;s final 9 seasons when he played centerfield).

For what it&#039;s worth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robin Yount was a lot of fun to watch.  He broke in so young (18) and piled up the hits to the point where I thought for a while that he might actually become the &#8220;Hit King&#8221;.  If memory serves, he was the youngest to reach 1500, 2000, and 2500 hits.  Problem is he &#8220;only&#8221; played 20 years and his numbers were declining in the 90&#8217;s (1990-1993).</p>
<p>I just did a quick check of the stats out of curiosity.  I would say that most people would agree that Yount was a great player (he is in the HOF after all) and was also considered a fantastic offensive shortstop.  You know where I&#8217;m going with this, right?  Even though many of us consider Rollins to be a great player and agree that he is the best SS in Phillies history, many of us, myself included, seem to harp on his deficiencies (hits too many fly balls), on what he does not do (draw enough walks), or on what he should be doing more of (hitting more line drives and ground balls and getting on base more).</p>
<p>So, let&#8217;s compare Rollin&#8217;s numbers to those of Yount.  Here are their numbers over their careers:</p>
<p>Per 162 games (Yount/Rollins)&#8230;.AB (624/682), Runs (93/109), Hits (178/189), 2b (33/40), 3b (7/12), HR (14/16), RBI (80/70), SB (15/38), CS (6/8), BB (55/55), SO (77/90), BA (.285/.277), OBP (.342/.333), OBP (.430/.441), TB (268/301)</p>
<p>Also, defensively Yount had a career fielding % over 11 years at SS of 0.964 (against a league FP of 0.964), while Rollins has a FP over 8 years at SS of 0.982 (against a league FP of 0.973).</p>
<p>I know that the 80&#8217;s and the 00&#8217;s are two different eras, but I&#8217;d say that Rollins compares pretty well.  What really surprised me were the walk (same as Yount), strikeout (not much worse especially considering Rollins struck out over 100 times in each of his first three full seasons), and the OBP (better the Yount) numbers.  I realize that Yount played 20 years and Rollins has a long way to go to match Yount&#8217;s consistency, but I am pleasantly surprised at how well he compares.  I wanted to pull out Yount&#8217;s stats specifically for the years he played SS (his first 11 seasons), but I couldn&#8217;t so I went with career averages over 162 games instead (which include Yount&#8217;s final 9 seasons when he played centerfield).</p>
<p>For what it&#8217;s worth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bski</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/the-reclinergms-2009-mlb-preview-milwaukee-brewers/#comment-11957</link>
		<dc:creator>bski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=4283#comment-11957</guid>
		<description>It feels great to say that Pat Gillick&#039;s method proved to be the right one in the end.  Winning the championship has vindicated him.

Remember, the Brewers were the ones who went all in when they got Sabathia (and lost LaPorta in the process like you said, Stu).  Meanwhile, &quot;Stand Pat&quot; made a lesser deal for Blanton and held on to our top prospects.

The Brewers made a good run at it but came up short, weakening themselves over the long run in the process.  On the other hand, we were able to go all the way and still stay solid enough to get several more shots at it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It feels great to say that Pat Gillick&#8217;s method proved to be the right one in the end.  Winning the championship has vindicated him.</p>
<p>Remember, the Brewers were the ones who went all in when they got Sabathia (and lost LaPorta in the process like you said, Stu).  Meanwhile, &#8220;Stand Pat&#8221; made a lesser deal for Blanton and held on to our top prospects.</p>
<p>The Brewers made a good run at it but came up short, weakening themselves over the long run in the process.  On the other hand, we were able to go all the way and still stay solid enough to get several more shots at it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/the-reclinergms-2009-mlb-preview-milwaukee-brewers/#comment-11955</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=4283#comment-11955</guid>
		<description>looks like they signed Braden Looper. So McClung won&#039;t be in the rotation after all. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looks like they signed Braden Looper. So McClung won&#8217;t be in the rotation after all. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/the-reclinergms-2009-mlb-preview-milwaukee-brewers/#comment-11953</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=4283#comment-11953</guid>
		<description>Pete, don&#039;t forget that they also had Matt LaPorta as a homegrown &quot;future stud&quot; up until the deadline last season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete, don&#8217;t forget that they also had Matt LaPorta as a homegrown &#8220;future stud&#8221; up until the deadline last season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jkay</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/the-reclinergms-2009-mlb-preview-milwaukee-brewers/#comment-11938</link>
		<dc:creator>jkay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 04:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=4283#comment-11938</guid>
		<description>poor brewers...they might as well do like the marlins and blow up and trade for prospects every season. heck once Ryan Braun sees the daylight from his rookie contract he&#039;ll bail for big money from the big teams. MLB needs to do something about this; salary cap?? No but someway to even it out, not everyone can get it all at once like the Rays (thank Goodness they had the good sense to finally drop the &#039;Devil&#039;).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>poor brewers&#8230;they might as well do like the marlins and blow up and trade for prospects every season. heck once Ryan Braun sees the daylight from his rookie contract he&#8217;ll bail for big money from the big teams. MLB needs to do something about this; salary cap?? No but someway to even it out, not everyone can get it all at once like the Rays (thank Goodness they had the good sense to finally drop the &#8216;Devil&#8217;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
