<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The ReclinerGM&#8217;s 2009 MLB Preview: Minnesota Twins</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reclinergm.com/the-reclinergms-2009-mlb-preview-minnesota-twins/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/the-reclinergms-2009-mlb-preview-minnesota-twins/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:41:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GARGS</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/the-reclinergms-2009-mlb-preview-minnesota-twins/#comment-12497</link>
		<dc:creator>GARGS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 03:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=4512#comment-12497</guid>
		<description>Well it looks like the Twins are close to signing Joe Crede.  Although I think Cabrera would be a more valuable asset to the Twins, Crede is a gamer who plays the game the right way.  IF he stays healthy (which seems to be a big if), he could be a very solid addition to the lineup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it looks like the Twins are close to signing Joe Crede.  Although I think Cabrera would be a more valuable asset to the Twins, Crede is a gamer who plays the game the right way.  IF he stays healthy (which seems to be a big if), he could be a very solid addition to the lineup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jjg</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/the-reclinergms-2009-mlb-preview-minnesota-twins/#comment-12333</link>
		<dc:creator>jjg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=4512#comment-12333</guid>
		<description>ditto, and looking forward to more eyewitnessing soon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ditto, and looking forward to more eyewitnessing soon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/the-reclinergms-2009-mlb-preview-minnesota-twins/#comment-12329</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=4512#comment-12329</guid>
		<description>I just prefer to not look at stats in a vaccum</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just prefer to not look at stats in a vaccum</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jjg</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/the-reclinergms-2009-mlb-preview-minnesota-twins/#comment-12327</link>
		<dc:creator>jjg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=4512#comment-12327</guid>
		<description>Pete,  Wouldn&#039;t call it &quot;useful in the right situation&quot; unless it supports one&#039;s argument, or one wants to distort.  I gave just one example of it&#039;s unintended hilarity (due to time constraint).  To each his own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete,  Wouldn&#8217;t call it &#8220;useful in the right situation&#8221; unless it supports one&#8217;s argument, or one wants to distort.  I gave just one example of it&#8217;s unintended hilarity (due to time constraint).  To each his own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/the-reclinergms-2009-mlb-preview-minnesota-twins/#comment-12320</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=4512#comment-12320</guid>
		<description>jjg-

wouldn&#039;t call it a &quot;joke&quot; but it def. needs the pitchers to have a similar amount of IP for it to be relevant since it doesn&#039;t take IP into account. 

not a be all, end all stat, but useful in the right situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jjg-</p>
<p>wouldn&#8217;t call it a &#8220;joke&#8221; but it def. needs the pitchers to have a similar amount of IP for it to be relevant since it doesn&#8217;t take IP into account. </p>
<p>not a be all, end all stat, but useful in the right situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jjg</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/the-reclinergms-2009-mlb-preview-minnesota-twins/#comment-12319</link>
		<dc:creator>jjg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=4512#comment-12319</guid>
		<description>That the pedestrian Dennis Lamp &#039;81 (&lt;strong&gt;7-6, 127 IP, 27 GS, 3 CG, 0 shutouts, 43 BB, 71 K, 2.41 ERA&lt;/strong&gt;) is ranked 479th should clearly inform you about the value of &#039;ERA+&#039; as it pertains to a fair evaluation of individual pitching seasons in a historical context.  It equates Lamp&#039;s performance to Jim Bunning &#039;67 (&lt;strong&gt;17-15, 302 IP, 40 GS, 16 CG, 6 shutouts, 73 BB, 253 K, 2.29 ERA&lt;/strong&gt;).  That measuring stick is a joke; give it credence at your own folly.    </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That the pedestrian Dennis Lamp &#8217;81 (<strong>7-6, 127 IP, 27 GS, 3 CG, 0 shutouts, 43 BB, 71 K, 2.41 ERA</strong>) is ranked 479th should clearly inform you about the value of &#8216;ERA+&#8217; as it pertains to a fair evaluation of individual pitching seasons in a historical context.  It equates Lamp&#8217;s performance to Jim Bunning &#8217;67 (<strong>17-15, 302 IP, 40 GS, 16 CG, 6 shutouts, 73 BB, 253 K, 2.29 ERA</strong>).  That measuring stick is a joke; give it credence at your own folly.    </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/the-reclinergms-2009-mlb-preview-minnesota-twins/#comment-12314</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=4512#comment-12314</guid>
		<description>Jesse-
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Pedro&#039;s 2000 season, in my opinion, is the greatest pitching season of all-time. &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;1.74 ERA (2nd place, Clemens at 3.70)&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;0.74 WHIP (2nd place, Mussina at 1.19 and the lowest WHIP in the history of baseball with 200+ IP)&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;5.31 H/9 (2nd place, Hudson at 7.52, 3rd lowest H/9 ever with 200+IP)&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;11.78 K/9 (2nd place, Colon at 10.15, 8th highest K/9 ever) with 200+ IP)&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;284 K (2nd place, Colon at 212)&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;all at the height of a live ball era, and in the american league&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesse-</p>
<div>
</div>
<div>Pedro&#8217;s 2000 season, in my opinion, is the greatest pitching season of all-time. </div>
<div>
</div>
<div>1.74 ERA (2nd place, Clemens at 3.70)</div>
<div>0.74 WHIP (2nd place, Mussina at 1.19 and the lowest WHIP in the history of baseball with 200+ IP)</div>
<div>5.31 H/9 (2nd place, Hudson at 7.52, 3rd lowest H/9 ever with 200+IP)</div>
<div>11.78 K/9 (2nd place, Colon at 10.15, 8th highest K/9 ever) with 200+ IP)</div>
<div>284 K (2nd place, Colon at 212)</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>all at the height of a live ball era, and in the american league</div>
<div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/the-reclinergms-2009-mlb-preview-minnesota-twins/#comment-12313</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=4512#comment-12313</guid>
		<description>Pete-

I was taking a look at the single season leaders in regards to ERA+.  Really shows how amazing Pedro Martinez was at the top of his game.
5 Seasons in the Top 50 All-Time...

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.baseball-reference.com/leaders/ERAplus_season.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.baseball-reference.com/leaders/ERAplus_season.shtml&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete-</p>
<p>I was taking a look at the single season leaders in regards to ERA+.  Really shows how amazing Pedro Martinez was at the top of his game.<br />
5 Seasons in the Top 50 All-Time&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.baseball-reference.com/leaders/ERAplus_season.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.baseball-reference.com/leaders/ERAplus_season.shtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GARGS</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/the-reclinergms-2009-mlb-preview-minnesota-twins/#comment-12292</link>
		<dc:creator>GARGS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 00:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=4512#comment-12292</guid>
		<description>Pete-
The AL Central is an absolute crap shoot.  I envision the champ with a meager 88-89 wins.  I think the Tigers have the highest ceiling but the Twins have the fewest question marks.  It could definitely be a 4-team race.  Although I really admired the way the Indians have been run the last few years, I question the additions of Pavano and Wood.  If Victor Matinez, Pronk, and Carmona don&#039;t rebound in a serious way, I see the Indians falling a little short.  If Verlander, Bonderman, Zumaya, and Shef don&#039;t rebound in a serious way, I also see the Tigers falling a little short.  The White Sox don&#039;t seem to have as many questions marks but I&#039;m hesitant to pick them.  I guess my prediction would look something like this:
1. Twins
2. Tigers
3. White Sox
4. Indians
5. Royals
As the degenerate gambler that I am, I have no confidence in these picks and wouldn&#039;t wager a nickel on them.  It wouldn&#039;t surprise me if the Indians actually ended up on top.  Also, if all the teams are bunched together with mediocre records like I expect, even the Royals could have a chance if they get hot the last two months of the season.  I totally waffled, but those are my picks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete-<br />
The AL Central is an absolute crap shoot.  I envision the champ with a meager 88-89 wins.  I think the Tigers have the highest ceiling but the Twins have the fewest question marks.  It could definitely be a 4-team race.  Although I really admired the way the Indians have been run the last few years, I question the additions of Pavano and Wood.  If Victor Matinez, Pronk, and Carmona don&#8217;t rebound in a serious way, I see the Indians falling a little short.  If Verlander, Bonderman, Zumaya, and Shef don&#8217;t rebound in a serious way, I also see the Tigers falling a little short.  The White Sox don&#8217;t seem to have as many questions marks but I&#8217;m hesitant to pick them.  I guess my prediction would look something like this:<br />
1. Twins<br />
2. Tigers<br />
3. White Sox<br />
4. Indians<br />
5. Royals<br />
As the degenerate gambler that I am, I have no confidence in these picks and wouldn&#8217;t wager a nickel on them.  It wouldn&#8217;t surprise me if the Indians actually ended up on top.  Also, if all the teams are bunched together with mediocre records like I expect, even the Royals could have a chance if they get hot the last two months of the season.  I totally waffled, but those are my picks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/the-reclinergms-2009-mlb-preview-minnesota-twins/#comment-12286</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=4512#comment-12286</guid>
		<description>indeed JJG....looks like some of the baseball juices are flowing again...
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;working (again) on a top-20 individual phillies seasons segment....should be some good debate there&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>indeed JJG&#8230;.looks like some of the baseball juices are flowing again&#8230;</p>
<div>
</div>
<div>working (again) on a top-20 individual phillies seasons segment&#8230;.should be some good debate there</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

