<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The ReclinerGM&#8217;s 2009 NL East Preview: Starting Rotation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reclinergm.com/the-reclinergms-2009-nl-east-preview-starting-rotation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/the-reclinergms-2009-nl-east-preview-starting-rotation/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:41:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jjg</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/the-reclinergms-2009-nl-east-preview-starting-rotation/#comment-14178</link>
		<dc:creator>jjg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=5211#comment-14178</guid>
		<description>&quot;I&#039;m throwing twice as hard as I ever did.  It&#039;s just not getting there as fast.&quot; 

- Lefty Gomez (Yankees pitcher 1930-1943)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m throwing twice as hard as I ever did.  It&#8217;s just not getting there as fast.&#8221; </p>
<p>- Lefty Gomez (Yankees pitcher 1930-1943)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J Dubbz</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/the-reclinergms-2009-nl-east-preview-starting-rotation/#comment-14177</link>
		<dc:creator>J Dubbz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 13:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=5211#comment-14177</guid>
		<description>I have yet to hear 1 single Mutts fan swallow their pride and admit that the Phillies were a superior team last year and won the world series without a &quot;but for the fact&quot; in there throwing all kinds of excuses around.  The Mutts 2-4 are good on paper, but unproven.  The Phillies staff just led a team to a World Fuggin Championship on their backs and the backs of the bullpen.

The only way to settle any argument here is on the field, as we are T minus 3 days until liftoff.  Should be a great season and intense rivalry as now WE are the ones looking down on the Mutts fans with a World Championship in our hands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have yet to hear 1 single Mutts fan swallow their pride and admit that the Phillies were a superior team last year and won the world series without a &#8220;but for the fact&#8221; in there throwing all kinds of excuses around.  The Mutts 2-4 are good on paper, but unproven.  The Phillies staff just led a team to a World Fuggin Championship on their backs and the backs of the bullpen.</p>
<p>The only way to settle any argument here is on the field, as we are T minus 3 days until liftoff.  Should be a great season and intense rivalry as now WE are the ones looking down on the Mutts fans with a World Championship in our hands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/the-reclinergms-2009-nl-east-preview-starting-rotation/#comment-14173</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 10:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=5211#comment-14173</guid>
		<description>Pete -

I do not put a great deal of merit into spring training stats, so while Park might have gaudy numbers to this point, my reasoning would be its probably because batters are like, &quot;wow that dude looks like Chan Ho Park, the dude that once threw a karate kick during a brawl in 1999&quot; and by the time they are done laughing to themselves at the fact that ANY team would give him a uniform they happen to be out. I read or heard somewhere, and for the life of me I can&#039;t remember where, maybe ESPN Fantasy Baseball Podcast, that the Park situation was spring hitters making him look good in hopes the Phils were dumb enough to give him a slot every fifth day so they could just tee off. And they were only half joking. I dont think either Park or Hernandez is gonna be any good, Hernandez will give you innings at the very least and keep the slot warm until Tim Redding (a better pitcher then either) or Niese is ready to take it. I would agree with you Happ is better then Niese to this point, as well. As to your final point, the Phils won the division by, what, 3 games? Against a team who lost their closer and missed the playoffs by a game - a team that blew late game leads 9 or 10 times just during the final stretch. Wagner was no sure thing, but I think even the most ardent Wagner hater would give him 4 saves in 10 chances. The Phils didnt have that disaster injury in a spot you can&#039;t fill late in the year, they got hot at the right time, and they won it. But the Mets beat the Phils head to head last season, pretty well if I remember correctly, and if not for the injury at the back end of the pen, I think we all know the story is a little different. A year more of seasoning and experience for Pelfrey, Perez &amp; Maine is to me, only a benefit...and that&#039;s not even playing the &quot;championship hangover/karmic breaks that went for you last year but against you this year&quot; card with regards to Myers, Blanton and Moyer. I know you can play the &quot;if&quot; game until you&#039;re blue in the face, but my point of contention is the line, &quot;No matter which way you do it, the Phillies are at the top&quot; - I think that&#039;s wishful thinking right there. Before a game that matters has been played, 1-4 I think the Mets are the better staff and that it isnt even particularly close. 5 &amp; 6 can be debated, sure. But as we all know games aren&#039;t played on paper, so we&#039;ll see how it all shakes out. Certainly, as always, enjoyed and appreciated reading all the hard work you guys put in here and the discussion as a whole - it&#039;s a tremendous site and I&#039;m a big fan. Well done, gents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete -</p>
<p>I do not put a great deal of merit into spring training stats, so while Park might have gaudy numbers to this point, my reasoning would be its probably because batters are like, &#8220;wow that dude looks like Chan Ho Park, the dude that once threw a karate kick during a brawl in 1999&#8243; and by the time they are done laughing to themselves at the fact that ANY team would give him a uniform they happen to be out. I read or heard somewhere, and for the life of me I can&#8217;t remember where, maybe ESPN Fantasy Baseball Podcast, that the Park situation was spring hitters making him look good in hopes the Phils were dumb enough to give him a slot every fifth day so they could just tee off. And they were only half joking. I dont think either Park or Hernandez is gonna be any good, Hernandez will give you innings at the very least and keep the slot warm until Tim Redding (a better pitcher then either) or Niese is ready to take it. I would agree with you Happ is better then Niese to this point, as well. As to your final point, the Phils won the division by, what, 3 games? Against a team who lost their closer and missed the playoffs by a game &#8211; a team that blew late game leads 9 or 10 times just during the final stretch. Wagner was no sure thing, but I think even the most ardent Wagner hater would give him 4 saves in 10 chances. The Phils didnt have that disaster injury in a spot you can&#8217;t fill late in the year, they got hot at the right time, and they won it. But the Mets beat the Phils head to head last season, pretty well if I remember correctly, and if not for the injury at the back end of the pen, I think we all know the story is a little different. A year more of seasoning and experience for Pelfrey, Perez &amp; Maine is to me, only a benefit&#8230;and that&#8217;s not even playing the &#8220;championship hangover/karmic breaks that went for you last year but against you this year&#8221; card with regards to Myers, Blanton and Moyer. I know you can play the &#8220;if&#8221; game until you&#8217;re blue in the face, but my point of contention is the line, &#8220;No matter which way you do it, the Phillies are at the top&#8221; &#8211; I think that&#8217;s wishful thinking right there. Before a game that matters has been played, 1-4 I think the Mets are the better staff and that it isnt even particularly close. 5 &amp; 6 can be debated, sure. But as we all know games aren&#8217;t played on paper, so we&#8217;ll see how it all shakes out. Certainly, as always, enjoyed and appreciated reading all the hard work you guys put in here and the discussion as a whole - it&#8217;s a tremendous site and I&#8217;m a big fan. Well done, gents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/the-reclinergms-2009-nl-east-preview-starting-rotation/#comment-14169</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 03:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=5211#comment-14169</guid>
		<description>Ian - 
I recall you being similarly appalled at my assessment of the Mets last year as well....hmmm....

just kidding, its good to have both sides....here are some counter points...

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Mike Pelfrey is a textbook example of a player who overachieved last year. Since 2000, 17 pitchers have pitched 200+ innings, with a sub-4 ERA, and a K/9 rate under 5 (Pelfrey was 4.93 last year). Of those 17, only &lt;span style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;2&lt;/span&gt; have repeated the feat... Tom Glavine and Kenny Rogers, both soft-tossing lefties who rely on help from umpires. Pelfrey would set the precident. Pelfrey had the 2nd lowest K/9 rate among all pitchers that pitched 200+ innings last year. This is the same exact logic I used to predict Kyle Kendrick and Brian Bannister&#039;s demise last year. He&#039;s better than both those guys (far better than Kendrick), but unless he sets a new precident, his numbers will rise. As for Myers, he was 7-4 with a 3.05 ERA and a 7.64 K/9 rate after he got himself fixed in the minors. As I said, I don&#039;t really trust him, but the fact that he is pitching for the biggest contract he&#039;s ever going to get is usually enough to get anyone focused. &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;You are right about the ace stuff with Perez, which makes it all the more crazy he had the 65th best WHIP in baseball last year. If he was that good, he would have had a 2nd contract offer this off-season. That being said, there wasn&#039;t a whole lot separating the top-3 there. &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Agree on Maine and Moyer&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;You obviously haven&#039;t seen Park pitch this spring. Dude is throwing 93 mph with a new change-up. He&#039;s made people look stupid all spring. Not saying he&#039;s going to be amazing, but he&#039;s not throwing 60 mph curveballs or anything up there. Hernandez will start the year off with a couple good starts and then fall off a cliff like he did with the Twins last year. Since 2006... Hernandez (5.23 ERA, 1.58 WHIP), Park (4.40 ERA, 1.40 WHIP). Livan has the highest WHIP in all of baseball during that time for any pitcher who pitched over 550 IP. &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Are you really saying that the Mets are better at &lt;span style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;every single&lt;/span&gt; pitching slot than the Phillies? I mean we won the World Series last year with the same staff, who were fantastic after the all-star break, and led us through the playoffs, not our offense. The starters had a 3.36 ERA after the all-star break (would have been good for 12th in NL as an individual, let alone a unit) and a 3.70 ERA and 1.19 WHIP during the playoffs. Don&#039;t mis-underestimate them. &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Looking forward to your thoughts on the hitters. &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian - <br />
I recall you being similarly appalled at my assessment of the Mets last year as well&#8230;.hmmm&#8230;.</p>
<p>just kidding, its good to have both sides&#8230;.here are some counter points&#8230;</p>
<ul>
<li>Mike Pelfrey is a textbook example of a player who overachieved last year. Since 2000, 17 pitchers have pitched 200+ innings, with a sub-4 ERA, and a K/9 rate under 5 (Pelfrey was 4.93 last year). Of those 17, only <span style="font-weight: bold;">2</span> have repeated the feat&#8230; Tom Glavine and Kenny Rogers, both soft-tossing lefties who rely on help from umpires. Pelfrey would set the precident. Pelfrey had the 2nd lowest K/9 rate among all pitchers that pitched 200+ innings last year. This is the same exact logic I used to predict Kyle Kendrick and Brian Bannister&#8217;s demise last year. He&#8217;s better than both those guys (far better than Kendrick), but unless he sets a new precident, his numbers will rise. As for Myers, he was 7-4 with a 3.05 ERA and a 7.64 K/9 rate after he got himself fixed in the minors. As I said, I don&#8217;t really trust him, but the fact that he is pitching for the biggest contract he&#8217;s ever going to get is usually enough to get anyone focused. </li>
<li>You are right about the ace stuff with Perez, which makes it all the more crazy he had the 65th best WHIP in baseball last year. If he was that good, he would have had a 2nd contract offer this off-season. That being said, there wasn&#8217;t a whole lot separating the top-3 there. </li>
<li>Agree on Maine and Moyer</li>
<li>You obviously haven&#8217;t seen Park pitch this spring. Dude is throwing 93 mph with a new change-up. He&#8217;s made people look stupid all spring. Not saying he&#8217;s going to be amazing, but he&#8217;s not throwing 60 mph curveballs or anything up there. Hernandez will start the year off with a couple good starts and then fall off a cliff like he did with the Twins last year. Since 2006&#8230; Hernandez (5.23 ERA, 1.58 WHIP), Park (4.40 ERA, 1.40 WHIP). Livan has the highest WHIP in all of baseball during that time for any pitcher who pitched over 550 IP. </li>
<li>Are you really saying that the Mets are better at <span style="font-weight: bold;">every single</span> pitching slot than the Phillies? I mean we won the World Series last year with the same staff, who were fantastic after the all-star break, and led us through the playoffs, not our offense. The starters had a 3.36 ERA after the all-star break (would have been good for 12th in NL as an individual, let alone a unit) and a 3.70 ERA and 1.19 WHIP during the playoffs. Don&#8217;t mis-underestimate them. </li>
<li>Looking forward to your thoughts on the hitters. </li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/the-reclinergms-2009-nl-east-preview-starting-rotation/#comment-14167</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 02:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=5211#comment-14167</guid>
		<description>Pete - As opposed to the sure things that are Brett Myers, Joe Blanton, Jamie Moyer and Chan Ho Park?!  You know I have nothing but love for you, but about the only thing you got right on here is that Santana is better then Hamels. Pelfrey isn&#039;t getting sent down, as Myers did. You can compare him to Kyle Kendrick all you want, but that&#039;s the &quot;Hey I hope we repeat&quot; talking, not the objective baseball fan. Pelfrey is a hard throwing young pitcher...lots of upside. Perez is a young, hard throwing lefthander with ace stuff under the wing of Johan Santana. The &quot;he got his contract, he&#039;s gonna mail it in, he was shaky in the WBC&quot; stuff is, to me, suspect at best. While I don&#039;t ever think Ollie will be dependable enough to be the alpha dog on a staff, on this one he doesnt have to be. He will at the very worst be what he was the last two years - a guy who is a lights-out killer in big games (especially against the Phils, Yanks and Braves)...and the guy who will give up 7 runs in 2 innings during a day game against Pittsburgh&#039;s fifth starter who just got called up. At worst he will be inconsistent. If he puts it together, he could win the Cy Young. Maine is a health question - he has the best stuff of any of the three, but the question is can he stay healthy. Similiar to the questions of will Myers totally lose it as he did just last year, will Blanton eat his way out of the league and/or pitch like the guy Oakland ran out of town on an extra-wide rail, will Moyer pitch like an old man. Livan is terrible, and is still better then Park. As a fifth starter he will pitch 7 innings and give up between 4-6 runs a game. Park will give up the same runs and do it in 4 less innings. The staffs are very comparable. An ace, three questions (where at least the Mets questions are all young upside guys, as compared to Crazy, Fat and Old), a question mark at the 5th spot and a kid waiting in the wings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete &#8211; As opposed to the sure things that are Brett Myers, Joe Blanton, Jamie Moyer and Chan Ho Park?!  You know I have nothing but love for you, but about the only thing you got right on here is that Santana is better then Hamels. Pelfrey isn&#8217;t getting sent down, as Myers did. You can compare him to Kyle Kendrick all you want, but that&#8217;s the &#8220;Hey I hope we repeat&#8221; talking, not the objective baseball fan. Pelfrey is a hard throwing young pitcher&#8230;lots of upside. Perez is a young, hard throwing lefthander with ace stuff under the wing of Johan Santana. The &#8220;he got his contract, he&#8217;s gonna mail it in, he was shaky in the WBC&#8221; stuff is, to me, suspect at best. While I don&#8217;t ever think Ollie will be dependable enough to be the alpha dog on a staff, on this one he doesnt have to be. He will at the very worst be what he was the last two years &#8211; a guy who is a lights-out killer in big games (especially against the Phils, Yanks and Braves)&#8230;and the guy who will give up 7 runs in 2 innings during a day game against Pittsburgh&#8217;s fifth starter who just got called up. At worst he will be inconsistent. If he puts it together, he could win the Cy Young. Maine is a health question &#8211; he has the best stuff of any of the three, but the question is can he stay healthy. Similiar to the questions of will Myers totally lose it as he did just last year, will Blanton eat his way out of the league and/or pitch like the guy Oakland ran out of town on an extra-wide rail, will Moyer pitch like an old man. Livan is terrible, and is still better then Park. As a fifth starter he will pitch 7 innings and give up between 4-6 runs a game. Park will give up the same runs and do it in 4 less innings. The staffs are very comparable. An ace, three questions (where at least the Mets questions are all young upside guys, as compared to Crazy, Fat and Old), a question mark at the 5th spot and a kid waiting in the wings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/the-reclinergms-2009-nl-east-preview-starting-rotation/#comment-14163</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 01:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=5211#comment-14163</guid>
		<description>MD-
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I think Mike Francesca&#039;s problem is that he&#039;s an idiot. Though, I don&#039;t expect much less from sports talk radio, where they aren&#039;t expected to know sports, just yell about them, and there is zero accountability. &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Livan Hernandez&lt;/span&gt; is the best #5 in the league because you know what you are going to get from him!? I know what you are going to get too... something similar to the 6.05 ERA he put up last year, or the 5.23 ERA he&#039;s had over the last 3. Yeah, he&#039;s a sure thing alright. &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MD-</p>
<div>
</div>
<div>I think Mike Francesca&#8217;s problem is that he&#8217;s an idiot. Though, I don&#8217;t expect much less from sports talk radio, where they aren&#8217;t expected to know sports, just yell about them, and there is zero accountability. <span style="font-style: italic;">Livan Hernandez</span> is the best #5 in the league because you know what you are going to get from him!? I know what you are going to get too&#8230; something similar to the 6.05 ERA he put up last year, or the 5.23 ERA he&#8217;s had over the last 3. Yeah, he&#8217;s a sure thing alright. </div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Donnelly</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/the-reclinergms-2009-nl-east-preview-starting-rotation/#comment-14161</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Donnelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 00:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=5211#comment-14161</guid>
		<description>I listen to 660am a lot, too much maybe, but according to Mike Francesca on the FAN Pelfrey is #2, Perez and Maine are interchangeable at  3 and 4.  Mike thinks Livan is the best #5 in the league based on you know what you are getting and he loves the fact that Livan is an innings eater and won&#039;t tax the bull-pen every 5th start. 

Mike also said Johan was probably the best pitcher in baseball right now, so he&#039;d agree with your #1 pitcher rank.   Mike thinks the Mets problems are with #2, #3 and #4 all three are very shaky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I listen to 660am a lot, too much maybe, but according to Mike Francesca on the FAN Pelfrey is #2, Perez and Maine are interchangeable at  3 and 4.  Mike thinks Livan is the best #5 in the league based on you know what you are getting and he loves the fact that Livan is an innings eater and won&#8217;t tax the bull-pen every 5th start. </p>
<p>Mike also said Johan was probably the best pitcher in baseball right now, so he&#8217;d agree with your #1 pitcher rank.   Mike thinks the Mets problems are with #2, #3 and #4 all three are very shaky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/the-reclinergms-2009-nl-east-preview-starting-rotation/#comment-14150</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 21:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=5211#comment-14150</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen both listed as the #2 in different places. I went by Mets.com in the end. And, Pelfrey is better anyway. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen both listed as the #2 in different places. I went by Mets.com in the end. And, Pelfrey is better anyway. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NL East Preview: Can the Phillies Repeat &#124; Heard in the Cheap Seats</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/the-reclinergms-2009-nl-east-preview-starting-rotation/#comment-14149</link>
		<dc:creator>NL East Preview: Can the Phillies Repeat &#124; Heard in the Cheap Seats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 21:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=5211#comment-14149</guid>
		<description>[...] Javier Vasquez will pitch deep into ballgames and may benefit from a change of scenery.  Jair Jurrjens had a promising rookie campaign last year winning 13 games and posting a 3.68 ERA.  Kenshin [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Javier Vasquez will pitch deep into ballgames and may benefit from a change of scenery.  Jair Jurrjens had a promising rookie campaign last year winning 13 games and posting a 3.68 ERA.  Kenshin [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu</title>
		<link>http://www.reclinergm.com/the-reclinergms-2009-nl-east-preview-starting-rotation/#comment-14147</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 20:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclinergm.com/?p=5211#comment-14147</guid>
		<description>Good analysis Pete, but I am confused about why you John Maine as a #4.  I would think he is the #2 guy there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good analysis Pete, but I am confused about why you John Maine as a #4.  I would think he is the #2 guy there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

